Calculators / DOTS formula

DOTS score

Score your powerlifting total against every other bodyweight.

Units
DOTS formula

DOTS score

Sex
Enter
DOTS
372.57
Verdict
Intermediate
Wilks
368.45
Wilks2
442.44

What a DOTS score actually is

A 60 kg lifter who totals 400 kg and a 120 kg lifter who totals 700 kg have both done something impressive, and nothing about the raw numbers tells you which is more impressive. A relative-strength coefficient settles it: divide the total by how much a lifter of that bodyweight would be expected to lift, and you get one number that compares everybody.

DOTS is that number. Tim Konertz published it in 2019 as a rebuild of the ageing Wilks coefficient, fitted to modern competition data. It takes only your sex, your bodyweight and your total, and it needs nothing else — no weight class, no federation, no equipment category.

What your score means

These bands are a rough guide, not an official classification — neither Konertz nor any federation publishes one. They are calibrated against the spread of DOTS scores you actually see in raw competition.

DOTSWhere that puts you
0–200BeginnerEveryone starts here.
200–300NovicePast the beginner phase.
300–400IntermediateYears of consistent training.
400–450AdvancedCompetitive at a regional meet.
450–500EliteNational-level podium.
500+World classInternational medal contention.

The bands are identical for men and women. Normalising sex away is precisely what the separate male and female coefficients are for, and it is why a meet can give out a single overall Best Lifter award.

DOTS vs Wilks vs IPF GL

Wilks (Robert Wilks, 1994) was the sport's standard for two decades. As the pool of competition data grew, its treatment of the very lightest and very heaviest lifters drew steady criticism, and most federations have now moved on. Wilks2 is his own 2020 refit; it is normalised to 600 rather than 500, so it reads roughly 20% higher and its numbers are not interchangeable with the original's.

DOTS is the answer most non-IPF federations landed on. The USPA settles Best Lifter placings by DOTS, and USA Powerlifting has used it for Open Best Lifter since 2022.

IPF GL points are the International Powerlifting Federation's own formula, official since 2020. They use a different shape entirely — an exponential rather than a polynomial — and are scaled so that 100 points is the standard of an average elite lifter at your bodyweight. In the IPF's 2020 evaluation of the competing models, IPF GL ranked first and DOTS second.

Run the same numbers through the Wilks calculator or the IPF GL calculator to see how far apart they land.

The formula

DOTS divides your total by a quartic polynomial in your bodyweight, with one set of coefficients for men and another for women:

DOTS = total × 500 / (a·bw⁴ + b·bw³ + c·bw² + d·bw + e)

Bodyweight and total are both in kilograms — pounds are converted first, never approximated. The fit only holds between about 40 and 210 kg for men; beyond that the polynomial turns over and the score would start rising with bodyweight, which is nonsense. We clamp to the edge and say so.

Watch it move

A DOTS score is only ever a snapshot of one day. Its whole point is to trend: as your total climbs and your bodyweight settles, the number tells you whether you are actually getting stronger or just getting bigger. That is the story your training log tells — log your squat, bench and deadlift in Bikkel and let the totals accumulate.

Related: estimate a one-rep max from a set you have actually done, or check your relative strength on a single lift.

Frequently asked

What is a good DOTS score?
As a rough guide: under 200 is a beginner, 300 marks a solidly trained lifter, 400 is competitive at a regional meet, and 500+ is international class. The very best men and women in the world score somewhere around 570 to 620. Because DOTS already normalises for sex and bodyweight, those bands read the same whoever you are.
Does DOTS stand for something?
Not officially. Tim Konertz never published it as an acronym. USA Powerlifting's rulebook glosses it as “Dynamic Objective Team Rating System”, and you will see similar back-formed phrases on other sites, but the author simply called it DOTS.
Is DOTS better than Wilks?
It is newer and fitted to modern competition data, which is the whole reason it exists — the 1994 Wilks coefficients were criticised for how they treated the lightest and heaviest lifters. In the IPF's own 2020 evaluation of scoring models, DOTS ranked second, behind only the IPF's GL formula and ahead of both Wilks and Wilks2.
Which federations use DOTS?
Most of the large non-IPF federations. The USPA establishes its Best Lifter placings by DOTS, and USA Powerlifting has used DOTS for Open Best Lifter since 2022. The IPF and its affiliates use their own IPF GL points instead.
Can I compare a male and a female DOTS score?
Yes — that is exactly what the formula is for. Men and women get different coefficients precisely so that the resulting scores land on one scale, which is how a meet can hand out a single overall Best Lifter award.
Do I need a competition total to use this?
No. Any squat, bench and deadlift you trust will do — enter them and the calculator adds them up. Just remember the score only means what your numbers mean: a gym total built from grindy singles is not the same as three white lights on the platform.
What happens at very light or very heavy bodyweights?
DOTS is a curve fitted to real competition data, so it is only trustworthy inside the range it was fitted on — roughly 40–210 kg for men and 40–150 kg for women. Outside it the maths stops behaving (past a certain bodyweight the score would start climbing again). This calculator clamps the bodyweight to the nearest edge and tells you it did, rather than quietly printing a number that means nothing.

Numbers are nice.
Reps are better.